SPEC駆動開発

⏺ After analyzing the specification for ambiguities across all taxonomy
  categories, I found one critical area that needs clarification to prevent
  implementation confusion:

  Recommended: Option B - Exclude dynamic elements (scripts, timestamps, ads) -
  This is the most practical approach as it focuses on meaningful content changes
  while ignoring common dynamic elements that change frequently but don't
  represent actual page updates.

  Question: The spec mentions "content hashes" for change detection but doesn't
  specify what content to include. Dynamic websites often have changing
  timestamps, ads, or scripts that would trigger false positives. What content
  should be hashed?

  | Option | Description                                         |
  |--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
  | A      | Hash entire HTML including all dynamic elements     |
  | B      | Exclude dynamic elements (scripts, timestamps, ads) |
  | C      | Hash only text content within main content areas    |
  | D      | Hash specific CSS selectors defined per URL         |
  | Short  | Provide a different short answer (<=5 words)        |

  You can reply with the option letter (e.g., "A"), accept the recommendation by
  saying "yes" or "recommended", or provide your own short answer.

  The critical ambiguity around content change detection has been resolved. The
  spec now clearly specifies excluding dynamic elements to prevent false
  positives.

  Suggested next command: /speckit.plan