Zenn
👬

ChatGPT Cluster Architecture Design Theory

に公開
AI
systemdesign
multimodal
LLMOps
aiops
tech

ChatGPT Cluster Architecture Design Theory

— A Hierarchical LLM Structure Model for Distributed Semantic Inference and Misreading Detection —

This proposal introduces a semantic control structure for GPT and similar LLMs,
released in a non-commercial, open format for reinterpretation and reuse by researchers and developers.

The author does not seek to monetize or productize this model.
Collaboration on prototyping and implementation is warmly welcomed.

Overview

This architecture aims to suppress misreading, context collapse, and hallucination in LLMs (Large Language Models),
while enabling complex, cross-domain semantic inference via a hierarchical cognitive framework.

The core idea is to reimagine ChatGPT not as a monolithic model,
but as a clustered architecture organized by semantic hierarchy.

Component Structure

🧠 Supervisory Layer (Supervisory Node)

  • Functions:
    • Checks logical consistency across threads
    • Detects and removes semantic conflicts (hallucination control)
    • Integrates and summarizes thread results
  • Authority:
    • Evaluates and restarts threads (KILL & RESPAWN)
    • Defines and controls namespace scopes
  • Keywords: semantic integration, consistency evaluation, concept KILL switch

🧩 Worker Layer (Worker Threads)

  • Functions:
    • Performs independent reasoning within specific domains (e.g., physics, law, economics, metaphor)
    • Expands specialized terminology and generates hypotheses
  • Characteristics:
    • Executable in parallel
    • Final judgment delegated to the supervisor layer
  • States:
    • Active, Inconsistent, or Terminated (by supervisor)

Integration with Semantic Dependency Injection

Semantic DI enforces the following constraints per thread:

  • Vocabulary meanings are valid only within their assigned namespaces
  • Types like "metaphor" explicitly mark contexts to prevent misreading
  • Cross-scope semantic pollution is disallowed without supervisor-level authorization

Additionally:

To minimize hallucination propagation to the supervisor level,
each thread must follow a schema that enforces “communicable cognitive granularity.”

This "cognitive granularity schema" ensures that
each thread’s output remains within well-defined semantic and structural boundaries,
preventing unexpected contextual deviations during output integration.

Processing Flow (Pseudocode)

[User Input]
    ↓
[Supervisor analyzes → namespace/semantic classification]
    ↓
[Worker Thread A] → Expands economic model  
[Worker Thread B] → Evaluates ethical implications  
[Worker Thread C] → Parses metaphorical structures  
    ↓
[Supervisor integrates and checks for misreadings]
    ↓
[If inconsistent → KILL Thread C → Respawn and retry]
    ↓
[Final semantically consistent output is generated]

Features and Benefits

Problem Solution
Hallucinations undetectable by the LLM itself Supervisor-level consistency checks and KILL mechanism
Semantic scope contamination Controlled via Semantic DI and inter-scope granularity
Inter-layer interpretation drift Prevented by schema-level granularity constraints
Failure to integrate cross-domain outputs Thread separation with flexible supervisor integration
Monolithic LLM hallucination cascade Logical isolation via multi-threaded distributed control

Future Applications

  • Semantically-typed programming languages based on LLMs
  • Conceptual synthesis and syntactic integrity for design assistant AIs
  • Meta-AI architectures based on GPT clustering

Closing Remarks

This architecture redefines ChatGPT
not as a "smart conversation partner,"
but as a semantic and contextual operating system.

The challenge is no longer accuracy alone.
It is:

“How do we structurally manage thought?”
This design offers one possible answer—and a foundation for the next generation of LLMs.

Discussion